Canada/U.S. Mutual Recognition Agreement
An updated Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) between Canada and the United States took effect on January 15, 2026, updating the longstanding relationship related to reciprocal licensure between the two countries.
All 11 of the Regulatory Organizations of Architecture in Canada (ROAC), including the OAA, are participants to the MRA, along with most of the U.S. Member Boards of the National Council of Architectural Registration Boards (NCARB). The agreement provides for the reciprocal registration of eligible Architects.
Those considering licensure under the MRA should contact the appropriate provincial/territorial/state licensing board to understand their individual process for reciprocal registration. U.S. Architects who wish to be licensed in Ontario should review the Reciprocal Application and Guidelines for Architects licensed in the United States.
To be eligible for reciprocal licensure under this agreement, you must be licensed and in good standing in a participating U.S. jurisdiction or Canadian province/territory—note that participating licensing boards may have specific requirements. U.S. architects must hold an active NCARB Certificate.
This mutual recognition agreement applies to holders of an unrestricted, active licence and does not extend to licences that are non-practising or subject to any terms, conditions, or limitations. Additionally, Architects who are licensed/registered in their home country through another international Mutual Recognition Agreement are not eligible under the MRA.
Understanding MRA Eligibility
Being licensed and in good standing with the OAA are requirements for eligibility under the MRA. However, good standing alone does not establish eligibility. The MRA is a licence-for-licence agreement based on the significant and substantial equivalence of qualifications at the point of licensure. As such, it applies to active, unrestricted architectural licences. Accordingly, an Architect who holds a licence subject to restrictions (e.g. terms, conditions, or limitations) may not be eligible to use that licence as the basis for reciprocal licensure under the MRA.
The MRA is not intended to provide an alternative pathway to expand the scope of an individual's existing licence. This distinction reflects the licence-for-licence nature of the MRA—the licence presented for recognition must be of a type and scope for which significant and substantial equivalency can be established in the participating jurisdiction.