Architectural design competitions can be a great way to solicit a wide range of ideas and approaches for many large-scale, landmark, or infrastructure projects. Competitions equitably open up your procurement process to all types of architecture practices, large and small. Well-managed competitions encourage transparency and fairness while also allowing for public engagement.
In an architectural competition, design solutions are judged on their comparative excellence, imagination, and ingenuity. The winner is awarded the commission for the project, whether a city hall, museum, transit facility or other significant facility. The competition’s sponsor must ensure the process is fair and equitable to all stakeholders. This should include following Qualifications-Based Selection.
Via its governing Council, the OAA endorses the Royal Architectural Institute of Canada’s (RAIC’s) competition documents and guidelines for Ontario-based competitions. Whether you are interested in hosting a competition or you are a member of the profession considering entering or judging one, click here to learn more. The RAIC website also explains how to set fair and equitable guidelines for roles, responsibilities, processes, and procedures. As RAIC is a national organization focused on broadly inclusive content, some of its terminology differs from what is found in Ontario’s Architects Act.
The RAIC cites two categories of architectural competitions:
Additionally, the RAIC recognizes three competition methods, but the terminology and definitions differ from what is set out in Ontario legislation governing the practice of architecture in the province. For example, the RAIC Guidelines’ definition of an "invited" competition corresponds to a "limited" competition under Ontario’s Architects Act and Regulation 27 .